Navigationsweiche Anfang

Navigationsweiche Ende

Sprache wählen


  • EIIW Policy Brief
    Verhandlungspositionen UK und EU nach dem BREXIT-Tag 31. Januar 2020: Britische... [mehr]
  • PRESSEMITTEILUNG: Historischer BREXIT – und dann?
    PRESSEMITTEILUNG Historischer BREXIT – und dann? • Historischer Brexit, verbunden mit... [mehr]
  • Buchpräsentation mit NRW Wirtschaftsminister Pinkwart am 29.11.
    Am 29. November 2019 präsentierte Prof. Welfens zusammen mit NRW Wirtschaftsminister Prof. Andreas... [mehr]
  • Kurzanalyse: CO2-Steuer als vernünftiges Klimapolitik-Instrument
    Lesen Sie hier Prof. Welfens Kurzanalyse zum Thema CO2-Steuer als vernünftiges... [mehr]
  • Prof. Welfens in Princeton
    Paul Welfens was in Princeton University, US, in April to present his book An Accidental BREXIT and... [mehr]
zum Archiv ->

Welfens, P.J.J.: Council of Economic Advisers: Biased Per Capita Consumption Comparison of the US with Europe

Welfens, P.J.J.: Council of Economic Advisers: Biased Per Capita Consumption Comparison of the US with Europe


JEL classification: N10, D4, I3, P46

Key words: US, EU, Comparative Economics, Market Economy, Welfare Analysis



In October 2018, the US Council of Economic Advisers has published a study entitled the Opportunity Costs of Socialism. That study, with an obvious focus on which reform options should not be considered for the US, looks at per capita consumption levels in 2016 and compares the US with Nordic European countries. The CEA’s conjecture that the US has a 30% lead vis-à-vis most of the Nordic Countries is as misleading as the alleged 18% lead vis-à-vis Norway: If one considers not just the year 2016 in isolation but the concept of an effective lifetime per capita consumption which takes into account the value of leisure time and expected life expectancy plus the transatlantic gap in out-of-pocket health care expenditures relative to income – about 1 point higher in the US than in Western and Northern European countries – the key finding is: Nordic countries (except Norway) face an effective lifetime consumption gap of 12%, not of 30% as claimed by the CEA. Meanwhile, Norway’s effective lifetime consumption actually exceeds that of the US by 2%. While the CEA publication apparently argues that the US should not consider Europe as a point of reference for systemic reforms, the effective lifetime figures for consumption per capita and income per capita suggest just this. The EU should export its Social Market Economy, whereby Asian countries in particular would be wise to study some of the leading EU countries.


Download the paper